You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microarray assessment of N-glycan-specific IgE and IgG profiles associated with Schistosoma mansoni infection in rural and urban Uganda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-40009-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gyaviira Nkurunungi, Angela van Diepen, Jacent Nassuuna, Richard E. Sanya, Margaret Nampijja, Irene Nambuya, Joyce Kabagenyi, Sonia Serna, Niels-Christian Reichardt, Ronald van Ree, Emily L. Webb, Alison M. Elliott, Maria Yazdanbakhsh, Cornelis H. Hokke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Uganda | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 23% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,011,355
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#47,313
of 125,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,797
of 352,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,950
of 4,557 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,557 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.