You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isolation and characterization of myogenic precursor cells from human cremaster muscle
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-40042-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neia Naldaiz-Gastesi, María Goicoechea, Isabel M-ª Aragón, Virginia Pérez-López, Sandra Fuertes-Alvarez, Bernardo Herrera-Imbroda, Adolfo López de Munain, Resi de Luna-Diaz, Pedro M. Baptista, M. Alejandro Fernández, María Fernanda Lara, Ander Izeta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#13,061,794
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#56,556
of 125,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,702
of 352,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,264
of 4,557 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,557 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.