↓ Skip to main content

The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, June 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rabia Bashir, Didi Surian, Adam G. Dunn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 33%
Computer Science 2 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,103,008
of 13,605,490 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#395
of 2,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,566
of 253,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#22
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,605,490 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,715 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.