↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, June 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.015
Pubmed ID
30849512
Authors

Rabia Bashir, Didi Surian, Adam G. Dunn

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,415,771
of 23,926,844 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#896
of 4,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,084
of 352,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#25
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,926,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.