↓ Skip to main content

The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rabia Bashir, Didi Surian, Adam G. Dunn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2019.
All research outputs
#956,082
of 12,680,079 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#321
of 2,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,200
of 160,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#24
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,680,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.