↓ Skip to main content

The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The risk of conclusion change in systematic review updates can be estimated by learning from a database of published examples
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, June 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rabia Bashir, Didi Surian, Adam G. Dunn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Master 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 23%
Unspecified 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,530,621
of 15,916,024 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#575
of 3,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,581
of 269,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#22
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,916,024 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.