↓ Skip to main content

Arguing About Empire: Imperial Rhetoric in Britain and France, 1882–1956, by Martin Thomas and Richard Toye

Overview of attention for article published in English Historical Review, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arguing About Empire: Imperial Rhetoric in Britain and France, 1882–1956, by Martin Thomas and Richard Toye
Published in
English Historical Review, March 2019
DOI 10.1093/ehr/cez043
Authors

Andrew W M Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,504,809
of 13,216,380 outputs
Outputs from English Historical Review
#54
of 1,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,380
of 251,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from English Historical Review
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,216,380 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,245 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.