↓ Skip to main content

Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Instruments for chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000114.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Young, Peter von Dadelszen, Zarko Alfirevic

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 23%
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Psychology 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 13 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,701,768
of 15,094,246 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,528
of 11,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,438
of 266,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,094,246 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.