You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Title |
California's Central Valley Groundwater Study: A Powerful New Tool to Assess Water Resources in California's Central Valley
|
---|---|
Published in |
US Geological Survey, July 2009
|
DOI | 10.3133/fs20093057 |
Authors |
Faunt, Claudia C., Hanson, Randall T., Belitz, Kenneth, Rogers, Laurel |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#20,557,521
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#2,101
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,259
of 111,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.