You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Redesign of a computerized clinical reminder for colorectal cancer screening: a human-computer interaction evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-11-74 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason J Saleem, David A Haggstrom, Laura G Militello, Mindy Flanagan, Chris L Kiess, Nicole Arbuckle, Bradley N Doebbeling |
| Abstract |
Based on barriers to the use of computerized clinical decision support (CDS) learned in an earlier field study, we prototyped design enhancements to the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA's) colorectal cancer (CRC) screening clinical reminder to compare against the VHA's current CRC reminder. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 26% |
| Researcher | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 49% |
| Computer Science | 17 | 15% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2016.
All research outputs
#12,660,065
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#846
of 1,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,801
of 240,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.