You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genomic aberrations in cell cycle genes predict progression of KIT-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Sarcoma Research, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13569-019-0112-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael C. Heinrich, Janice Patterson, Carol Beadling, Yuexiang Wang, Maria Debiec-Rychter, Barbara Dewaele, Christopher L. Corless, Anette Duensing, Chandrajit P. Raut, Brian Rubin, Tamas Ordog, Matt van de Rijn, Jerry Call, Thomas Mühlenberg, Jonathan A. Fletcher, Sebastian Bauer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 60% |
Spain | 1 | 10% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 12% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Professor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 12% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,654,565
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#13
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,512
of 352,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Sarcoma Research
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.