↓ Skip to main content

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for prevention of complications after pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for prevention of complications after pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010355.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria FS Torres, Gustavo JM Porfírio, Alan PV Carvalho, Rachel Riera

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 16%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 17 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,924,388
of 15,055,678 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,523
of 11,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,710
of 265,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,055,678 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.