↓ Skip to main content

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for prevention of complications after pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for prevention of complications after pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010355.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria FS Torres, Gustavo JM Porfírio, Alan PV Carvalho, Rachel Riera

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 25%
Unspecified 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Other 6 10%
Other 14 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 54%
Unspecified 13 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 5 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2019.
All research outputs
#9,977,417
of 13,046,269 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,315
of 10,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,188
of 249,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,046,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.