You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global monitoring of antimicrobial resistance based on metagenomics analyses of urban sewage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-08853-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rene S. Hendriksen, Patrick Munk, Patrick Njage, Bram van Bunnik, Luke McNally, Oksana Lukjancenko, Timo Röder, David Nieuwenhuijse, Susanne Karlsmose Pedersen, Jette Kjeldgaard, Rolf S. Kaas, Philip Thomas Lanken Conradsen Clausen, Josef Korbinian Vogt, Pimlapas Leekitcharoenphon, Milou G. M. van de Schans, Tina Zuidema, Ana Maria de Roda Husman, Simon Rasmussen, Bent Petersen, Clara Amid, Guy Cochrane, Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten, Heike Schmitt, Jorge Raul Matheu Alvarez, Awa Aidara-Kane, Sünje J. Pamp, Ole Lund, Tine Hald, Mark Woolhouse, Marion P. Koopmans, Håkan Vigre, Thomas Nordahl Petersen, Frank M. Aarestrup |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 284 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 35 | 12% |
| United States | 21 | 7% |
| Spain | 12 | 4% |
| Australia | 11 | 4% |
| Finland | 8 | 3% |
| Chile | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| Ireland | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 72 | 25% |
| Unknown | 98 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 159 | 56% |
| Scientists | 104 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1283 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 219 | 17% |
| Researcher | 196 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 146 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 98 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 61 | 5% |
| Other | 197 | 15% |
| Unknown | 366 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 204 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 168 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 81 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 78 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 5% |
| Other | 216 | 17% |
| Unknown | 473 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 420. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2024.
All research outputs
#70,317
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#1,076
of 58,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,427
of 366,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#26
of 1,365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.