You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
| Title |
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and the Supreme Court’s Interpretation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
AMA Journal of Ethics, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.1.hlaw1-1201 |
| Pubmed ID |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 31 | 47% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 15% |
| Scientists | 4 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 23% |
| Psychology | 4 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |