↓ Skip to main content

Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors

Overview of attention for article published in Gaceta Sanitaria, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 984)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
45 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors
Published in
Gaceta Sanitaria, July 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.01.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabel Campos-Varela, Alberto Ruano-Raviña

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor 7 7%
Librarian 6 6%
Other 32 32%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 13 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 7%
Chemistry 6 6%
Other 30 30%
Unknown 26 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#579,639
of 21,756,717 outputs
Outputs from Gaceta Sanitaria
#15
of 984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,653
of 286,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gaceta Sanitaria
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,756,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.