↓ Skip to main content

Signs of biological activities of 28,000-year-old mammoth nuclei in mouse oocytes visualized by live-cell imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 74,272)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Signs of biological activities of 28,000-year-old mammoth nuclei in mouse oocytes visualized by live-cell imaging
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-40546-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuo Yamagata, Kouhei Nagai, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Masayuki Anzai, Hiromi Kato, Kei Miyamoto, Satoshi Kurosaka, Rika Azuma, Igor I. Kolodeznikov, Albert V. Protopopov, Valerii V. Plotnikov, Hisato Kobayashi, Ryouka Kawahara-Miki, Tomohiro Kono, Masao Uchida, Yasuyuki Shibata, Tetsuya Handa, Hiroshi Kimura, Yoshihiko Hosoi, Tasuku Mitani, Kazuya Matsumoto, Akira Iritani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,076 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Other 7 11%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Chemistry 3 5%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 6 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2506. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#537
of 14,395,361 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#9
of 74,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29
of 263,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,395,361 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 74,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them