↓ Skip to main content

Signs of biological activities of 28,000-year-old mammoth nuclei in mouse oocytes visualized by live-cell imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 114,192)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Signs of biological activities of 28,000-year-old mammoth nuclei in mouse oocytes visualized by live-cell imaging
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-40546-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuo Yamagata, Kouhei Nagai, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Masayuki Anzai, Hiromi Kato, Kei Miyamoto, Satoshi Kurosaka, Rika Azuma, Igor I. Kolodeznikov, Albert V. Protopopov, Valerii V. Plotnikov, Hisato Kobayashi, Ryouka Kawahara-Miki, Tomohiro Kono, Masao Uchida, Yasuyuki Shibata, Tetsuya Handa, Hiroshi Kimura, Yoshihiko Hosoi, Tasuku Mitani, Kazuya Matsumoto, Akira Iritani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3,433 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 9 9%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 18 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Chemistry 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 18 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2851. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,819
of 21,423,731 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#19
of 114,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27
of 285,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,423,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them