↓ Skip to main content

Bridging the Gap: Lottery-Based Procedures in Early Parliamentarization

Overview of attention for article published in World Politics, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Bridging the Gap: Lottery-Based Procedures in Early Parliamentarization
Published in
World Politics, March 2019
DOI 10.1017/s0043887118000291
Authors

Alexandra Cirone, Brenda Van Coppenolle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 67%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#815,152
of 13,756,564 outputs
Outputs from World Politics
#60
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,725
of 254,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Politics
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,756,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.