You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure in Australia: trends, inequalities and the impact on household living standards in a high-income country with a universal health care system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Economics Review, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13561-019-0227-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily J. Callander, Haylee Fox, Daniel Lindsay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 20% |
| Unknown | 58 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2023.
All research outputs
#4,498,741
of 24,664,952 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#79
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,105
of 356,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,664,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.