↓ Skip to main content

“Geographies of Peoples”: Scientific Racialism and Labor Internationalism in Gilded Age American Socialism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 112)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
“Geographies of Peoples”: Scientific Racialism and Labor Internationalism in Gilded Age American Socialism
Published in
Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era, March 2019
DOI 10.1017/s1537781418000701
Authors

Lorenzo Costaguta

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,367,601
of 13,693,516 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era
#6
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,677
of 254,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Gilded Age & Progressive Era
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,693,516 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them