You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dynamic molecular changes during the first week of human life follow a robust developmental trajectory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-08794-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy H. Lee, Casey P. Shannon, Nelly Amenyogbe, Tue B. Bennike, Joann Diray-Arce, Olubukola T. Idoko, Erin E. Gill, Rym Ben-Othman, William S. Pomat, Simon D. van Haren, Kim-Anh Lê Cao, Momoudou Cox, Alansana Darboe, Reza Falsafi, Davide Ferrari, Daniel J. Harbeson, Daniel He, Cai Bing, Samuel J. Hinshaw, Jorjoh Ndure, Jainaba Njie-Jobe, Matthew A. Pettengill, Peter C. Richmond, Rebecca Ford, Gerard Saleu, Geraldine Masiria, John Paul Matlam, Wendy Kirarock, Elishia Roberts, Mehrnoush Malek, Guzmán Sanchez-Schmitz, Amrit Singh, Asimenia Angelidou, Kinga K. Smolen, Ryan R. Brinkman, Al Ozonoff, Robert E. W. Hancock, Anita H. J. van den Biggelaar, Hanno Steen, Scott J. Tebbutt, Beate Kampmann, Ofer Levy, Tobias R. Kollmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 190 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 26% |
| Canada | 23 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 10% |
| Australia | 14 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| China | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 53 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 105 | 55% |
| Scientists | 68 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 262 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 65 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 38 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 74 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 268. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#136,307
of 25,635,728 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#1,956
of 57,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,831
of 365,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#50
of 1,403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,635,728 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.