↓ Skip to main content

Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption

Overview of attention for article published in this source, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
306 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Legislative smoking bans for reducing secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, April 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005992.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Callinan, Joanne E, Clarke, Anna, Doherty, Kirsten, Kelleher, Cecily

Abstract

Smoking bans have been implemented in a variety of settings, as well as being part of policy in many jurisdictions to protect the public and employees from the harmful effects of secondhand smoke (SHS). They also offer the potential to influence social norms and smoking behaviour of those populations they affect.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 157 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 29%
Student > Master 47 29%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Other 45 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 52%
Social Sciences 27 17%
Psychology 15 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Other 45 28%