↓ Skip to main content

Multi-dimensional optimization of small wind turbine blades

Overview of attention for article published in Sustainable Energy Research, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-dimensional optimization of small wind turbine blades
Published in
Sustainable Energy Research, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40807-015-0009-x
Authors

Matias Sessarego, David Wood

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Professor 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 27 44%
Energy 12 19%
Unspecified 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Sustainable Energy Research
#8
of 27 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,128
of 277,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sustainable Energy Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one scored the same or higher as 19 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them