↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic flood modeling essential to assess the coastal impacts of climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
93 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Dynamic flood modeling essential to assess the coastal impacts of climate change
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-40742-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick L. Barnard, Li H. Erikson, Amy C. Foxgrover, Juliette A. Finzi Hart, Patrick Limber, Andrea C. O’Neill, Maarten van Ormondt, Sean Vitousek, Nathan Wood, Maya K. Hayden, Jeanne M. Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 32%
Researcher 17 23%
Student > Master 12 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 27%
Environmental Science 18 24%
Engineering 10 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 15 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 229. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#59,016
of 14,012,772 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#783
of 70,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,072
of 261,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,012,772 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them