↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic flood modeling essential to assess the coastal impacts of climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
93 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Dynamic flood modeling essential to assess the coastal impacts of climate change
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-40742-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick L. Barnard, Li H. Erikson, Amy C. Foxgrover, Juliette A. Finzi Hart, Patrick Limber, Andrea C. O’Neill, Maarten van Ormondt, Sean Vitousek, Nathan Wood, Maya K. Hayden, Jeanne M. Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 40%
Researcher 11 24%
Unspecified 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 24%
Unspecified 11 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 22%
Engineering 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 6 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 215. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2019.
All research outputs
#58,930
of 13,352,588 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#805
of 64,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,146
of 252,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,352,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them