↓ Skip to main content

Missed opportunities for diagnosing brain tumours in primary care: a qualitative study of patient experiences

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
57 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Missed opportunities for diagnosing brain tumours in primary care: a qualitative study of patient experiences
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, March 2019
DOI 10.3399/bjgp19x701861
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona M Walter, Clarissa Penfold, Alexis Joannides, Smiji Saji, Margaret Johnson, Colin Watts, Andrew Brodbelt, Michael D Jenkinson, Stephen J Price, Willie Hamilton, Suzanne E Scott

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Lecturer 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 29%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Neuroscience 1 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#339,594
of 13,757,863 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#165
of 3,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,475
of 254,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#11
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,757,863 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.