↓ Skip to main content

Subjects with hip osteoarthritis show distinctive patterns of trunk movements during gait-a body-fixed-sensor based analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subjects with hip osteoarthritis show distinctive patterns of trunk movements during gait-a body-fixed-sensor based analysis
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-9-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inge HF Reininga, Martin Stevens, Robert Wagenmakers, Sjoerd K Bulstra, Johan W Groothoff, Wiebren Zijlstra

Abstract

Compensatory trunk movements during gait, such as a Duchenne limp, are observed frequently in subjects with osteoarthritis of the hip, yet angular trunk movements are seldom included in clinical gait assessments. Hence, the objective of this study was to quantify compensatory trunk movements during gait in subjects with hip osteoarthritis, outside a gait laboratory, using a body-fixed-sensor based gait analysis. Frontal plane angular movements of the pelvis and thorax and spatiotemporal parameters of persons who showed a Duchenne limp during gait were compared to healthy subjects and persons without a Duchenne limp.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 37 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 24%
Engineering 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Sports and Recreations 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 46 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#447
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,065
of 251,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.