↓ Skip to main content

The Dynamic Process Tracing Environment (DPTE) as a Tool for Studying Political Communication

Overview of attention for article published in Political Communication, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
The Dynamic Process Tracing Environment (DPTE) as a Tool for Studying Political Communication
Published in
Political Communication, March 2019
DOI 10.1080/10584609.2019.1579771
Authors

David J. Andersen, David P. Redlawsk, Richard R. Lau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 50%
Social Sciences 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,379,193
of 13,172,575 outputs
Outputs from Political Communication
#160
of 557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,508
of 250,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Communication
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,172,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.