↓ Skip to main content

The influence of patient case mix on public health area statistics for cancer stage at diagnosis: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Public Health, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of patient case mix on public health area statistics for cancer stage at diagnosis: a cross-sectional study
Published in
European Journal of Public Health, March 2019
DOI 10.1093/eurpub/ckz024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew E Barclay, Gary A Abel, Lucy Elliss-Brookes, David C Greenberg, Georgios Lyratzopoulos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,237,788
of 13,635,041 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Public Health
#1,708
of 2,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,891
of 253,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Public Health
#40
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,635,041 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.