You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation fidelity in a complex intervention promoting psychosocial well-being following stroke: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-019-0694-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Line Kildal Bragstad, Berit Arnesveen Bronken, Unni Sveen, Ellen Gabrielsen Hjelle, Gabriele Kitzmüller, Randi Martinsen, Kari J. Kvigne, Margrete Mangset, Marit Kirkevold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 3 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 52 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 57 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,270,153
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,069
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,786
of 351,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#48
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.