↓ Skip to main content

Working Time Society consensus statements: Evidence based interventions using light to improve circadian adaptation to working hours

Overview of attention for article published in Industrial Health, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Working Time Society consensus statements: Evidence based interventions using light to improve circadian adaptation to working hours
Published in
Industrial Health, January 2019
DOI 10.2486/indhealth.sw-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne LOWDEN, Gülcin ÖZTÜRK, Amy REYNOLDS, Bjørn BJORVATN

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 24 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 13%
Psychology 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 28 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,757,283
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Industrial Health
#220
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,097
of 446,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Industrial Health
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.