↓ Skip to main content

Working Time Society consensus statements: Evidence based interventions using light to improve circadian adaptation to working hours

Overview of attention for article published in Industrial Health, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Working Time Society consensus statements: Evidence based interventions using light to improve circadian adaptation to working hours
Published in
Industrial Health, January 2019
DOI 10.2486/indhealth.sw-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arne LOWDEN, Gülcin ÖZTÜRK, Amy REYNOLDS, Bjørn BJORVATN

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 45%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Librarian 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 18%
Unspecified 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Other 4 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,025,933
of 13,646,195 outputs
Outputs from Industrial Health
#396
of 531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,553
of 253,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Industrial Health
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,646,195 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 531 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.