↓ Skip to main content

Extensive X-linked adaptive evolution in central chimpanzees

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extensive X-linked adaptive evolution in central chimpanzees
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1106877109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Hvilsom, Yu Qian, Thomas Bataillon, Yingrui Li, Thomas Mailund, Bettina Sallé, Frands Carlsen, Ruiqiang Li, Hancheng Zheng, Tao Jiang, Hui Jiang, Xin Jin, Kasper Munch, Asger Hobolth, Hans R. Siegismund, Jun Wang, Mikkel Heide Schierup

Abstract

Surveying genome-wide coding variation within and among species gives unprecedented power to study the genetics of adaptation, in particular the proportion of amino acid substitutions fixed by positive selection. Additionally, contrasting the autosomes and the X chromosome holds information on the dominance of beneficial (adaptive) and deleterious mutations. Here we capture and sequence the complete exomes of 12 chimpanzees and present the largest set of protein-coding polymorphism to date. We report extensive adaptive evolution specifically targeting the X chromosome of chimpanzees with as much as 30% of all amino acid replacements being adaptive. Adaptive evolution is barely detectable on the autosomes except for a few striking cases of recent selective sweeps associated with immunity gene clusters. We also find much stronger purifying selection than observed in humans, and in contrast to humans, we find that purifying selection is stronger on the X chromosome than on the autosomes in chimpanzees. We therefore conclude that most adaptive mutations are recessive. We also document dramatically reduced synonymous diversity in the chimpanzee X chromosome relative to autosomes and stronger purifying selection than for the human X chromosome. If similar processes were operating in the human-chimpanzee ancestor as in central chimpanzees today, our results therefore provide an explanation for the much-discussed reduction in the human-chimpanzee divergence at the X chromosome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 5%
Germany 2 2%
Denmark 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 114 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 31%
Researcher 32 25%
Student > Master 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 7 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 8 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 12%
Computer Science 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 11 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2012.
All research outputs
#1,716,384
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#22,274
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,356
of 254,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#177
of 808 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 808 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.