↓ Skip to main content

Legal liabilities in research: early lessons from North America

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Legal liabilities in research: early lessons from North America
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, June 2005
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-6-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Randi Zlotnik Shaul, Shelley Birenbaum, Megan Evans

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 50%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 25%
Social Sciences 2 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2016.
All research outputs
#10,995,964
of 12,373,815 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#504
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,961
of 278,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,815 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them