↓ Skip to main content

Restrictive pulmonary function is more prevalent in patients with ankylosing spondylitis than in matched population controls and is associated with impaired spinal mobility: a comparative study

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Restrictive pulmonary function is more prevalent in patients with ankylosing spondylitis than in matched population controls and is associated with impaired spinal mobility: a comparative study
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/ar3699
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gunnhild Berdal, Silje Halvorsen, Désirée van der Heijde, Morten Mowe, Hanne Dagfinrud

Abstract

Pulmonary involvement is a known manifestation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, previous studies have been based on small samples and the reported prevalence and associations with typical clinical features vary. The purpose of this study was to compare pulmonary function (PF) in patients with AS and population controls, and to study associations between PF and disease related variables, cardio-respiratory fitness and demographic variables in patients with AS.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 9 15%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 57%
Sports and Recreations 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 6 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,340,842
of 12,728,337 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,314
of 2,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,485
of 213,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#97
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,728,337 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.