You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Tweeting the Headache Meetings: Cross‐Sectional Analysis of Twitter Activity Surrounding American Headache Society Conferences
Headache: The Journal of Head & Face Pain, March 2019
Marcus N. Callister, Matthew S. Robbins, Natalie R. Callister, Bert B. Vargas
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||14||82%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||12%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||5||16%|
|Student > Master||4||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||5||16%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||3||10%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2020.
All research outputs
of 24,829,155 outputs
Outputs from Headache: The Journal of Head & Face Pain
of 3,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 357,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Headache: The Journal of Head & Face Pain
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,829,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.