@IanCopeland5 https://t.co/fNZsqGGAbK P>0.5 is proof, >0.05 is made up "brick wall" cutoff based on dice throwing! Perfect for scummy manipulation! oh familiar...
@kareem_carr Null hypothesis significance testing has done more harm than good and it should be abandoned/retired. https://t.co/tx9blim0Sk https://t.co/PGF8wsdSsV
@pilolight1 @PedsGeekMD Yep argument of manipulators https://t.co/fNZsqGGAbK
@grantabt @lakens Also from this one from Greenland & Amrhein: https://t.co/fpIltxaWQc "Second, not all values inside are equally compatible with the data, given the assumptions. The point estimate is the most compatible, and values near it are more c
RT @kkkkkkk777: 同じジャーナルに掲載された2019年のコメントでは、「統計的有意性の誤用は、科学界と科学的アドバイスに依存する人々に多大な損害を与えた」と述べられている。 https://t.co/iOEWiewNaC #イベルメクチン #ivermectin
同じジャーナルに掲載された2019年のコメントでは、「統計的有意性の誤用は、科学界と科学的アドバイスに依存する人々に多大な損害を与えた」と述べられている。 https://t.co/iOEWiewNaC #イベルメクチン #ivermectin
Knock knock!! Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/k4vBXxibnV
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/oOx9mmcTx5
RT @fereshtehjahan1: "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" https://t.co/wkkWN1zMQL
"Scientists rise up against statistical significance" https://t.co/wkkWN1zMQL
How #statistics lead scientists to deny differences those not educated in statistics can plainly see?...non-significance doesn't ‘prove’ null--that no difference between groups or no effect...Nor do statistically significance ‘prove’ some other hypothesis
@BenCTurnbull Btw. here is some ammunition if you want to give it a try and reviewers complain: https://t.co/kNrGh6fn0X https://t.co/h3qFs7B1QD https://t.co/ZXGmTXPgNk Some pushback discussed here, but I mostly disagree with that, seems to miss a lot of p
We are not calling for a ban on P values. Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/RkW1CJJERH
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/zbZvBiouZ1
RT @ueafam: 『その論文の著者は、#物理学 学士(優等生)#医学物理学 博士である #コーネル大学 #獣医学部 @cornellvet 研究准教授 [https://t.co/98CY3cK9mQ] ですので、その誤りが #数学 的な能力の欠如が原因かは疑問です。彼は…
RT @alexandrosM: Statisticians have been trying to get doctors to stop abusing statistics in this way for a very long time. Doctors have be…
RT @alexandrosM: Statisticians have been trying to get doctors to stop abusing statistics in this way for a very long time. Doctors have be…
"Valentin Amrhein, Sander Greenland, Blake McShane und mehr als 800 Unterzeichner fordern ein Ende der übertriebenen Behauptungen und der Vernachlässigung möglicherweise entscheidender Auswirkungen."
RT @alexandrosM: Statisticians have been trying to get doctors to stop abusing statistics in this way for a very long time. Doctors have be…
「統計的有意」よ、さようなら Amrhein et al. 2019. Nature. P値の二分主義(有意か有意でないかを0.05で分ける)をやめて、推定値と整合性区間(信頼区間のこと)を(95%にゼロが入るか、ではない)議論をしよう https://t.co/DaoRYcUVhU
Great thread, but this post by itself is extremely important.
Statisticians have been trying to get doctors to stop abusing statistics in this way for a very long time. Doctors have been refusing to listen. They like the false certainty. But the fact of the matter is that probability simply doesn't work that way. h
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/aU5IY03JTU . 2019 article by @vamrhein et al
RT @Drgarthdavis: This is an excellent article in Nature. I don’t agree that statistical significance be abandoned BUT people with no exper…
RT @AliceYeMD: What would a post-‘statistical significance’ world look like? “People will spend less time with statistical software, and mo…
RT @AliceYeMD: What would a post-‘statistical significance’ world look like? “People will spend less time with statistical software, and mo…
What would a post-‘statistical significance’ world look like? “People will spend less time with statistical software, and more time thinking.” o( ❛ᴗ❛ )o #quoteoftheday https://t.co/NLYzWGsH7s
Sharing this article with anyone who deals with statistics (so basically everyone). Easy read and straight to the point!
Natureに統計的有意性概念とおさらばしよう,論文が掲載されてもうすぐ4年.日本では高校教科書に確率勉強していない学生に検定概念を教えるトンデモな学習指導要領ができて進行中だな.https://t.co/qZy9iMPlO1
RT @agarwl_: Following [1, 2], we recommend using confidence intervals for measuring the uncertainty in results and showing performance imp…
RT @Lester_Domes: @JohnDeaconTX @drjohnm @VPrasadMDMPH @adamcifu @Sensible__Med @f2harrell @ehlJAMA I'm fine with giving P-values without u…
RT @Lester_Domes: @JohnDeaconTX @drjohnm @VPrasadMDMPH @adamcifu @Sensible__Med @f2harrell @ehlJAMA I'm fine with giving P-values without u…
RT @Lester_Domes: @JohnDeaconTX @drjohnm @VPrasadMDMPH @adamcifu @Sensible__Med @f2harrell @ehlJAMA I'm fine with giving P-values without u…
@JohnDeaconTX @drjohnm @VPrasadMDMPH @adamcifu @Sensible__Med @f2harrell @ehlJAMA I'm fine with giving P-values without use of "significance" to describe them; see the linked articles in John's post. No one should be forcing use of "significance"; we need
RT @ToeNegro: Ludzie są na Was wkurzeni, ponieważ zajęliście najwygodniejsze możliwe miejsce popularyzowania nauki, nie poruszając przy tym…
RT @ToeNegro: Ludzie są na Was wkurzeni, ponieważ zajęliście najwygodniejsze możliwe miejsce popularyzowania nauki, nie poruszając przy tym…
RT @ToeNegro: Ludzie są na Was wkurzeni, ponieważ zajęliście najwygodniejsze możliwe miejsce popularyzowania nauki, nie poruszając przy tym…
@AmiCla2 @ChissaSonoChi @auroraasgambati @Crowley40511390 @Cloe__08 Il caso che menzionavo prima, ossia il dubbio sulla significatività statistica di quegli studi, basata sull’uso non corretto degli strumenti statistici é molto recente. C’è stata una lette
RT @ToeNegro: Ludzie są na Was wkurzeni, ponieważ zajęliście najwygodniejsze możliwe miejsce popularyzowania nauki, nie poruszając przy tym…
RT @ToeNegro: Ludzie są na Was wkurzeni, ponieważ zajęliście najwygodniejsze możliwe miejsce popularyzowania nauki, nie poruszając przy tym…
RT @ToeNegro: Ludzie są na Was wkurzeni, ponieważ zajęliście najwygodniejsze możliwe miejsce popularyzowania nauki, nie poruszając przy tym…
RT @ToeNegro: Ludzie są na Was wkurzeni, ponieważ zajęliście najwygodniejsze możliwe miejsce popularyzowania nauki, nie poruszając przy tym…
RT @ToeNegro: Ludzie są na Was wkurzeni, ponieważ zajęliście najwygodniejsze możliwe miejsce popularyzowania nauki, nie poruszając przy tym…
Ludzie są na Was wkurzeni, ponieważ zajęliście najwygodniejsze możliwe miejsce popularyzowania nauki, nie poruszając przy tym największych problemów z jakimi nauka się boryka. Kiedy powołujecie się na jakieś badania, nie podchodzicie do nich krytycznie. ht
RT @lyndiawu1: Time to abandon binary concept of statistical significance? https://t.co/RQfCKTLaqm
RT @AlexR_L: Scientists rise up against statistical significance. @westernuepibio @SchulichMedDent https://t.co/2fE6bJSaD7 DM for a PDF…
RT @AlexR_L: Scientists rise up against statistical significance. @westernuepibio @SchulichMedDent https://t.co/2fE6bJSaD7 DM for a PDF…
Scientists rise up against statistical significance. @westernuepibio @SchulichMedDent https://t.co/2fE6bJSaD7 DM for a PDF copy of the article. https://t.co/c6CqIPsohs
@BasVanHooren Absolutely agree. A well-written intro sets up the aim to where a stated hypothesis is seemingly moot. And to your last point, preregistration is the answer to reduced statistical bias (and even better IMO, ban the use of NHST in applied scie
@murrayfield17 ¡Es un súper tema! En 2019 lo conocí en Lausana en congreso de periodismo científico a uno de los líderes de esa rebelión, Valentin Amrhein, autor de este comentario en Nature: https://t.co/kQtKKomJST Muy iluminador. No basta el valor de p
@tracyktownsend @RCarhartHarris There are no apolitical scientists. This discussion reflects a misunderstanding of science and its relationship to politics. See, e.g., Sander Greenland's work. https://t.co/Dt3BbTRWPS… https://t.co/HwwwKdwTrD… https://t.co/
@zerdeve Sander Greenland's work. E.g., https://t.co/Dt3BbTRWPS https://t.co/HwwwKdwTrD https://t.co/gFzrvxMtkO https://t.co/rOz7hdgXct
@J____A____Y Or perhaps we can just abolish the use of dichotomous statistical modeling based on an arbitrary p-value cutoff... https://t.co/81k0e1r1JX
RT @diegoftellez: Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/DOU3z2NksC
RT @ueafam: 『その論文の著者は、#物理学 学士(優等生)#医学物理学 博士である #コーネル大学 #獣医学部 @cornellvet 研究准教授 [https://t.co/98CY3cK9mQ] ですので、その誤りが #数学 的な能力の欠如が原因かは疑問です。彼は…
Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/lsBfJsBeUO
RT @ivermectin_team: COMMENT 20 March 2019 Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/w7PgevjIDa "An analysis of 791…
7⃣ "統計的有意・・辞めようか", Nature, 2019 https://t.co/Mm3F1ABqVV 8⃣ N Engl J Medの新しい指針 (2019)🏹 https://t.co/FAPwTRp2Ko 9⃣🇺🇸栄養学会の考察・指針 (2021)?💭 https://t.co/dlKW71bzaH
@adamsilverhq @LukeW Sometimes it is and sometimes it isn’t. Many of us treat the concepts “statistically significant” and “significant in practice” as if they were the same but they really are very different ideas. This takes you to in-depth academic dis
RT @BradSchoenfeld: @ChrisSchneiRUB @lakens @Lester_Domes I advocate for interpreting findings continuously rather than dichotomously, cons…
RT @GeorgetTanner: Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/K9aEGUN2Ye
@Truth_in_Number On behalf of the American Statistical Association, I beg you to stop using "not statistically significant" to imply "no effect". https://t.co/NMXARFkTlS https://t.co/OqeiESUx8D
@ChrisSchneiRUB @lakens @Lester_Domes I advocate for interpreting findings continuously rather than dichotomously, considering both the magnitude of the effect and the associated uncertainty based on the CIs (as articulated by Amrhein et al) https://t.co/
@guipenteadoo Boa reflexão. Gosto muito desses dois papers: https://t.co/4JDzSHcZT5 https://t.co/XILqo6kIAG
1. Scientists rise up against statistical significance (https://t.co/rcgBoyQwGD) Provides clarity in understanding and distinguishing between the concepts of "statistically significant results" and "clinically important effects".
1. Scientists rise up against statistical significance (https://t.co/rcgBoyQwGD) Permite entender y diferenciar los conceptos de “resultados estadísticamente significativos” y “efectos clínicamente importantes”. https://t.co/jqH2FMElnR
RT @genkuroki: #統計 ちなみに、かなりの話題になったnatureに出た記事 https://t.co/iP7DtlyLnk Scientists rise up against statistical significance Valentin Amrhein…
#統計 ちなみに、かなりの話題になったnatureに出た記事 https://t.co/iP7DtlyLnk Scientists rise up against statistical significance Valentin Amrhein, Sander Greenland, Blake McShane 2019 でも、compatibilityによる解釈で統計学の誤用を抑制しようという話になっています。
@alexandrosM Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/EXwvG2SwbN
RT @ueafam: 『その論文の著者は、#物理学 学士(優等生)#医学物理学 博士である #コーネル大学 #獣医学部 @cornellvet 研究准教授 [https://t.co/98CY3cK9mQ] ですので、その誤りが #数学 的な能力の欠如が原因かは疑問です。彼は…
RT @le_science4all: Il y a 4 ans @Nature avait publié un article co-signé par plus de 800 chercheurs qui appelaient à bannir les conclusion…
RT @le_science4all: Il y a 4 ans @Nature avait publié un article co-signé par plus de 800 chercheurs qui appelaient à bannir les conclusion…
RT @le_science4all: Il y a 4 ans @Nature avait publié un article co-signé par plus de 800 chercheurs qui appelaient à bannir les conclusion…
RT @le_science4all: Il y a 4 ans @Nature avait publié un article co-signé par plus de 800 chercheurs qui appelaient à bannir les conclusion…
RT @le_science4all: Il y a 4 ans @Nature avait publié un article co-signé par plus de 800 chercheurs qui appelaient à bannir les conclusion…
Il y a 4 ans @Nature avait publié un article co-signé par plus de 800 chercheurs qui appelaient à bannir les conclusions fondées sur la p-value. https://t.co/FQyLD8xtNq Une édition spéciale de @AmstatNews s'opposait explicitement à ce genre de conclusion.
@ankimo000 @KonoBellYoko 有意差ありなしでの二分でなく信頼区間でみましょうというはなしです https://t.co/aiIdbfWY9m
RT @dr_iver_mecton: Pierre cannot be fooled! JAMA clearly is owned by all the pharmaceutical companies at once! That is why it would publi…
@octavianosag @CharlesStassi Free yourself from ignorance and learn https://t.co/dSVT8Nl6K9
@Schmidt_Julio_C @TonyClimate The modern scientific method is not capable of proving anything, it only corroborates, improves or refutes hypotheses. But yes, the scientist can also use logical conclusions, for scientific inferences that are not just statis
RT @Lester_Domes: The quote is from a Cornell professor with an honors BSc in Physics and a PhD in Medical Physics, so I doubt if its error…
@DrDNeiverth @igoreckert @GidMK Check this out: https://t.co/U0x4C2uIRS It really isn't semantics like Gid likes to act like it is. The authors are claiming discovery when the hypothesis test failed. I.e saying there was no effect. Lmk if you need more tha
@saint_nine_ @aguzmanj Ya que estamos en eso y quieres hablar de Anovas y significancia estadística (para ya ibas, ¿cierto?). Te sugiero leas este pequeño artículo de Nature: Scientists rise up against statistical significance https://t.co/aPIrgl1A0f
@WTXAgronomy Well, I signed onto this back in the day. https://t.co/4FGwD4dTL3
#psyc4180 has opened my eyes to p-hacking! Selectively reporting data that supports a hypothesis undermines the integrity of research and can lead to false inclusions. Who knew you couldn't trust published research? 🥴@julie_conder @chantelle0090 https://t.
"We must learn to embrace uncertainty. One practical way to do so is to rename confidence intervals as ‘compatibility intervals’ and...remember all the values between the interval’s limits are reasonably compatible with the data..." https://t.co/FwyGk9Vj7
@AlessiaChris Here's an excellent read on the topic https://t.co/81k0e1r1JX
RT @AazamVirani: When all is said and done, someone out there will examine a random sample of scientists and claim to reject the null hypot…
RT @genkuroki: #統計 個人的には、以下のリンク先で紹介した3つの文献で解説されているP値の使い方と、大学学部生向けの統計学入門の教科書での説明(最近では高校生向けの説明)を比較して欲しいと思います。 その違いの大きさは非常に大きいと思います。 こういうのって…