You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A one stop shop for cost-effectiveness evidence? Recommendations for improving Disease Control Priorities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-019-0175-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthias Arnold, Susan Griffin, Jessica Ochalek, Paul Revill, Simon Walker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 32% |
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 61% |
| Scientists | 10 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,418,493
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#21
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,149
of 358,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them