↓ Skip to main content

The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading revisited

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading revisited
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2019
DOI 10.3758/s13423-019-01590-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Denis Drieghe, Aaron Veldre, Gemma Fitzsimmons, Jane Ashby, Sally Andrews

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
France 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 33 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 31%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 41%
Linguistics 7 18%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Computer Science 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 4 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,490,555
of 13,532,333 outputs
Outputs from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#847
of 1,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,760
of 255,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,532,333 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.