↓ Skip to main content

Early intervention to promote oral feeding in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neurology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early intervention to promote oral feeding in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Neurology, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2377-11-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hideaki Takahata, Keisuke Tsutsumi, Hiroshi Baba, Izumi Nagata, Masahiro Yonekura

Abstract

Stroke is a major cause of dysphagia, but little is known about when and how dysphagic patients should be fed and treated after an acute stroke. The purpose of this study is to establish the feasibility, risks and clinical outcomes of early intensive oral care and a new speech and language therapist/nurse led structured policy for oral feeding in patients with an acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Cameroon 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2013.
All research outputs
#12,660,437
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#929
of 2,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,768
of 181,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.