↓ Skip to main content

Multi-site investigation of strategies for the clinical implementation of CYP2D6 genotyping to guide drug prescribing

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics in Medicine, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multi-site investigation of strategies for the clinical implementation of CYP2D6 genotyping to guide drug prescribing
Published in
Genetics in Medicine, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41436-019-0484-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Larisa H. Cavallari, Sara L. Van Driest, Cynthia A. Prows, Jeffrey R. Bishop, Nita A. Limdi, Victoria M. Pratt, Laura B. Ramsey, D. Max Smith, Sony Tuteja, Benjamin Q. Duong, J. Kevin Hicks, James C. Lee, Aniwaa Owusu Obeng, Amber L. Beitelshees, Gillian C. Bell, Kathryn Blake, Daniel J. Crona, Lynn Dressler, Ryan A. Gregg, Lindsay J. Hines, Stuart A. Scott, Richard C. Shelton, Kristin Wiisanen Weitzel, Julie A. Johnson, Josh F. Peterson, Philip E. Empey, Todd C. Skaar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 13%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,749,774
of 16,251,718 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#966
of 2,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,245
of 271,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#52
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,251,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.