You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Welfare Convergence, Bureaucracy, and Moral Distancing at the Food Bank
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Antipode, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/anti.12531 |
| Authors |
Jon May, Andrew Williams, Paul Cloke, Liev Cherry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 64% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 75% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 31 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 37 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,990,120
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Antipode
#194
of 1,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,360
of 364,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antipode
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,242 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.