↓ Skip to main content

Ecology for a Crowded Planet

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
409 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
863 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecology for a Crowded Planet
Published in
Science, May 2004
DOI 10.1126/science.1095780
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret Palmer, Emily Bernhardt, Elizabeth Chornesky, Scott Collins, Andrew Dobson, Clifford Duke, Barry Gold, Robert Jacobson, Sharon Kingsland, Rhonda Kranz, Michael Mappin, M. Luisa Martinez, Fiorenza Micheli, Jennifer Morse, Michael Pace, Mercedes Pascual, Stephen Palumbi, O. J. Reichman, Ashley Simons, Alan Townsend, Monica Turner

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 863 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 38 4%
Brazil 12 1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
Sweden 4 <1%
South Africa 4 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Other 24 3%
Unknown 757 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 165 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 158 18%
Student > Master 126 15%
Professor 68 8%
Student > Bachelor 63 7%
Other 206 24%
Unknown 77 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 334 39%
Environmental Science 280 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 40 5%
Social Sciences 29 3%
Engineering 22 3%
Other 47 5%
Unknown 111 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,282,781
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from Science
#33,855
of 77,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,417
of 57,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#99
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.