↓ Skip to main content

Can assemblage think difference? A feminist critique of assemblage geographies

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Human Geography, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can assemblage think difference? A feminist critique of assemblage geographies
Published in
Progress in Human Geography, March 2019
DOI 10.1177/0309132519836162
Authors

Eden Kinkaid

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 37%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 39 51%
Arts and Humanities 8 11%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Design 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 17 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,575,506
of 19,960,113 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Human Geography
#123
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,172
of 283,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Human Geography
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,960,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.