↓ Skip to main content

Intratesticular injection followed by electroporation allows gene transfer in caprine spermatogenic cells

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intratesticular injection followed by electroporation allows gene transfer in caprine spermatogenic cells
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-21558-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Kumar Pramod, Abhijit Mitra

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Student > Bachelor 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 41%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,038,695
of 23,136,540 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#73,468
of 125,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,234
of 337,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,431
of 4,050 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,136,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,050 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.