You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Malawi Stories: mapping an art-science collaborative process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Maps, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/17445647.2019.1582440 |
| Authors |
Philip J. Nicholson, Deborah Dixon, Deepa Pullanikkatil, Boyson Moyo, Hazel Long, Brian Barrett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 70% |
| South Africa | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 30% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 23% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,177,835
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Maps
#107
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,719
of 352,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Maps
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.