↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
289 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
433 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis for bacterial infections in afebrile neutropenic patients following chemotherapy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004386.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anat Gafter‐Gvili, Abigail Fraser, Mical Paul, Liat Vidal, Theresa A Lawrie, Marianne D van de Wetering, Leontien CM Kremer, Leonard Leibovici

Abstract

Bacterial infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who are neutropenic following chemotherapy for malignancy. Trials have shown the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the incidence of bacterial infections but not in reducing mortality rates. Our systematic review from 2006 also showed a reduction in mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 429 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 14%
Researcher 49 11%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Other 41 9%
Student > Postgraduate 39 9%
Other 90 21%
Unknown 110 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 202 47%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 136 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,628,254
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,791
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,961
of 251,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.