↓ Skip to main content

Neuromodulators for pain management in rheumatoid arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
223 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuromodulators for pain management in rheumatoid arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008921.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bethan L Richards, Samuel L Whittle, Rachelle Buchbinder

Abstract

Pain management is a high priority for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Despite deficiencies in research data, neuromodulators have gained widespread clinical acceptance as adjuvants in the management of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 219 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 18%
Researcher 36 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 35 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 43%
Psychology 17 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 50 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2018.
All research outputs
#495,212
of 13,378,007 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,542
of 10,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,428
of 210,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 533 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,378,007 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 533 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.