↓ Skip to main content

Integrated Fragmentation and the Role of Leading Small Groups in Chinese Politics

Overview of attention for article published in The China Journal, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 154)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated Fragmentation and the Role of Leading Small Groups in Chinese Politics
Published in
The China Journal, July 2019
DOI 10.1086/700670
Authors

Wen-Hsuan Tsai, Wang Zhou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 38%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 63%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 13%
Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,083,674
of 16,284,469 outputs
Outputs from The China Journal
#12
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,646
of 272,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The China Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,284,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them