↓ Skip to main content

West Nile Virus and Wildlife

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
West Nile Virus and Wildlife
Published in
BioScience, January 2004
DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0393:wnvaw]2.0.co;2
Authors

PETER P. MARRA, SEAN GRIFFING, CAROLEE CAFFREY, A. MARM KILPATRICK, ROBERT McLEAN, CHRISTOPHER BRAND, EMI SAITO, ALAN P. DUPUIS, LAURA KRAMER, ROBERT NOVAK

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 4 1%
India 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 269 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 72 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 19%
Student > Master 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Other 23 8%
Other 57 20%
Unknown 18 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 167 58%
Environmental Science 43 15%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 25 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,878,701
of 19,188,609 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#1,187
of 2,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,594
of 282,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#23
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,188,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.