↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri-implantitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri-implantitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004970.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Esposito, Maria Gabriella Grusovin, Helen V Worthington

Abstract

One of the key factors for the long-term success of oral implants is the maintenance of healthy tissues around them. Bacterial plaque accumulation induces inflammatory changes in the soft tissues surrounding oral implants and it may lead to their progressive destruction (peri-implantitis) and ultimately to implant failure. Different treatment strategies for peri-implantitis have been suggested, however it is unclear which are the most effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 292 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 21%
Student > Postgraduate 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Researcher 29 10%
Other 55 18%
Unknown 50 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 200 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Psychology 5 2%
Materials Science 4 1%
Other 15 5%
Unknown 62 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,001,333
of 18,978,726 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,496
of 11,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,842
of 230,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 498 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,978,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 498 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.