↓ Skip to main content

Strategies for eliciting and synthesizing evidence for guidelines in rare diseases

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
34 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies for eliciting and synthesizing evidence for guidelines in rare diseases
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-019-0713-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Menaka Pai, Cindy H. T. Yeung, Elie A. Akl, Andrea Darzi, Christopher Hillis, Kimberly Legault, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Nancy Santesso, Domenica Taruscio, Madeleine Verhovsek, Holger J. Schünemann, Alfonso Iorio

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Professor 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Social Sciences 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2019.
All research outputs
#668,386
of 14,453,232 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#92
of 1,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,410
of 265,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,453,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them