↓ Skip to main content

What to do about those immunoprecipitation blues

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
58 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What to do about those immunoprecipitation blues
Published in
Nature Methods, March 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41592-019-0365-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivien Marx

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 27%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 18%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,216,387
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,545
of 5,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,028
of 357,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#28
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.