↓ Skip to main content

The Natural Wood Regime in Rivers

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Natural Wood Regime in Rivers
Published in
BioScience, March 2019
DOI 10.1093/biosci/biz013
Authors

Ellen Wohl, Natalie Kramer, Virginia Ruiz-Villanueva, Daniel N Scott, Francesco Comiti, Angela M Gurnell, Herve Piegay, Katherine B Lininger, Kristin L Jaeger, David M Walters, Kurt D Fausch

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 26%
Student > Master 18 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 4 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 22 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 19%
Engineering 10 11%
Neuroscience 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 21 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,419,754
of 14,995,644 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#1,035
of 2,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,289
of 266,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,995,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.