↓ Skip to main content

Whole genome paired-end sequencing elucidates functional and phenotypic consequences of balanced chromosomal rearrangement in patients with developmental disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Genetics, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whole genome paired-end sequencing elucidates functional and phenotypic consequences of balanced chromosomal rearrangement in patients with developmental disorders
Published in
Journal of Medical Genetics, March 2019
DOI 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105778
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Schluth-Bolard, Flavie Diguet, Nicolas Chatron, Pierre-Antoine Rollat-Farnier, Claire Bardel, Alexandra Afenjar, Florence Amblard, Jeanne Amiel, Sophie Blesson, Patrick Callier, Yline Capri, Patrick Collignon, Marie-Pierre Cordier, Christine Coubes, Benedicte Demeer, Annabelle Chaussenot, Florence Demurger, Françoise Devillard, Martine Doco-Fenzy, Céline Dupont, Jean-Michel Dupont, Sophie Dupuis-Girod, Laurence Faivre, Brigitte Gilbert-Dussardier, Anne-Marie Guerrot, Marine Houlier, Bertrand Isidor, Sylvie Jaillard, Géraldine Joly-Hélas, Valérie Kremer, Didier Lacombe, Cédric Le Caignec, Aziza Lebbar, Marine Lebrun, Gaetan Lesca, James Lespinasse, Jonathan Levy, Valérie Malan, Michele Mathieu-Dramard, Julie Masson, Alice Masurel-Paulet, Cyril Mignot, Chantal Missirian, Fanny Morice-Picard, Sébastien Moutton, Gwenaël Nadeau, Céline Pebrel-Richard, Sylvie Odent, Véronique Paquis-Flucklinger, Laurent Pasquier, Nicole Philip, Morgane Plutino, Linda Pons, Marie-France Portnoï, Fabienne Prieur, Jacques Puechberty, Audrey Putoux, Marlène Rio, Caroline Rooryck-Thambo, Massimiliano Rossi, Catherine Sarret, Véronique Satre, Jean-Pierre Siffroi, Marianne Till, Renaud Touraine, Annick Toutain, Jérome Toutain, Stéphanie Valence, Alain Verloes, Sandra Whalen, Patrick Edery, Anne-Claude Tabet, Damien Sanlaville

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 67%
Unspecified 3 25%
Psychology 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,901,394
of 13,472,087 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#369
of 2,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,769
of 255,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,472,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.