↓ Skip to main content

Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tranexamic acid for upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006640.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gluud LL, Klingenberg SL, Langholz E, Gluud, Lise Lotte, Klingenberg, Sarah Louise, Langholz, Ebbe

Abstract

Tranexamic acid reduces haemorrhage through its antifibrinolytic effects. In a previous version of the present review, we found that tranexamic acid may reduce mortality. The present review includes updated searches of randomised trials on tranexamic acid versus placebo, cimetidine or lansoprazole.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Ecuador 1 2%
France 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 48 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 20%
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 7 13%
Other 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 69%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 4 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,805,318
of 14,356,956 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,529
of 10,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,471
of 212,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#218
of 527 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,356,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,258 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 527 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.